R. M. Prasad, J.

1. The Misc. Appeal has been filed for setting aside the order dated 2-1-96passed by the presiding Officer, Family Court, Patna in matrimonial case No.70 of 1994, whereby and whereunder the trial court ordered for payment of Rs.750a as interim maintenance to the respondent with effect from the date of the petition and further allowed Rs.6,000/- as litigation cost in one lump sum besides rs.340/- for each trip as cost for conveyance for her each trip from Ranchi to Patna if she personally attends the court along with escort and Rs.400/- per day for her stay at Patna in connection with the case.

2. The Stamp Reporter, in his report, dated 13-2-96 has pointed out that the Misc. Appeal filed under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is against the order dated 2-1-96, by which the learned court has allowed the interim maintenance and cost of litigation only, which is purely an interlocutory order and thus, the remedy seems to lie by way of filing a civil revision Application under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code. Hence, according to him, the present misc. appeal does not appear to be maintainable. Accordingly the matter has come up before me under