SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 131

N.PANDEY, S.N.MISHRA, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Ram Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Election Commission – Respondent


Judgment

N.Pandey, J.

1. The salient and meaningful questions which arise for determination before this Full Bench may be formulated in the following terms:

(i) Whether an owner of a vehicle, which was requisitioned by the State Government under Sec. 160 read with Sec. 161 (1) and (2) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, (hereinafter called the Act), in the event of an accident on election duty, is entitled to compensation and, if so, from whom?

(ii) If it is contended that Sec. 160 read with Sec. 161 (1) and (2) of the Act only provides for hire charges but no compensation, even due to loss or damage, whether such provisions are not in conflict with the provisions of Article 19 read with Article 300-A of the Constitution?

2. The relevant facts of the case are not in serious dispute and, therefore, may be noticed with relative brevity. The petitioner is the owner of a vehicle (Jeep) bearing registration No. BHD 7273. The said vehicle was insured with Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. for the period commencing from 5.10.89 to 4.10.1990. District Magistrate-cum-Returning Officer, Muzaffarpur, while exercising a delegated power on behalf of the State Government under Secs. 160 and 161



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top