SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 173

D.P.WADHWA, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Krishna Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.J.MUKHOPADHAYA, J.

1. The controversy relating to reservation in the matter of education and service, which started since 1951, was ultimately set at rest in the end of 1992, by the Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney V/s. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 477.Immediately thereafter, by the Constitutions (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992, a new principle of reservation has been laid down under Article 243D of Constitution of India, in the matter of Panchayat election. The Respondent-State of Bihar then came out with Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 (for short Panchayat Act, 1993). The aforesaid Constitutional Amendment and Panchayat Act, 1993 have now given rise to the new controversy relating to reservation in Panchayat election. By the aforesaid 73rd Amendment of Constitution, followed by Panchayat Act, 1993, a new Provision has been laid down, reserving seats in favour of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward class persons, in the matter of Panchayat election. As to whether such reservation of seats in the matter of Panchayat election is permissible or not, is the main issue in the present writ petitions.

2. The petitioners of C.W.J.C. 3351/94 have challenged a part of Article 24












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top