SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Pat) 487

S.K.CHATTOPADHYAYA
Kaushalya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Agrawal – Respondent


Judgment

S.K.CHATTOPADHYAYA, J.

1. Whether step mother is entitled for maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code for short), is the moot question to be answered in this application. However, as no decision either of the Apex court or of this court could be brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the parties, the question is to be answered after reconciling the divergent views expressed by the different High Courts.

2. Before adverting to the points raised the factual backdrops may be looked into. Incontroverted the petitioner is the wife of late Hari Narayan Prasad Agrawal and is the step mother of the opposite party. Tho petitioner filed an application before the learned Magistrate claiming maintenance of Rs. 600 per month for her own and Rs. 50 each for her two daughters. It was claimed by her that the opposite party has monthly income of Rs, 10,000 from the properties left behind by her husband. On such petition being filed the opposite party appeared and filed his show cause contending, inter alia, that the petitioner being the step mother is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of the Code.

3. It appears that the opposite party




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top