SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 711

RADHA MOHAN PRASAD
Chandrika Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Joint Director Of Consolidation. Bihar, Patna – Respondent


Judgment

Radha Mohan Prasad, J.

1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 3-1-97, contained in Annexure-3, passed by the Joint Director, consolidation, Bihar, Patna (respondent No.1) purporting to be in exercise of the power under Sec.35 of the bihar Consolidation of Holdings and prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

2. It is submitted by learned Counsel for the petitioners that a revision application was filed by the respondents concerned directly under Sec.35 of the Act without availing the remedy by way of appeal. However, even the said revision was filed after the village was confirmed in terms of the provisions -contained in Sec.13 of the Act and delivery of possession was also effected in terms of Sec.15 of the Act. Thus, according to him, the Joint Director, consolidation (respondent No.1) was not justified in exercising the power under Sec.35 of the Act, inasmuch as the effect of the order passed by him will lead to disturbing the entire Chaks determined by the Consolidation authorities.

3. None has appeared on behalf of the respondents concerned to oppose this writ petition.

4. While admitting the writ petition on 23-4-


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top