SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Pat) 508

B.P.SINGH
Ram Chandra Yadav – Appellant
Versus
A. Wati Ao, Additional Member, Board Of Revenue – Respondent


Judgment

B. P. Singh, J.

1. The instant writ petition arises out of a proceeding under Sec.16 (3) of the Bihar Land reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961. The said proceeding for pre-emption was initiated on an application filed by respondent No.5 herein. The Deputy collector, Land Reforms, Biharshariff by his order dated 27th July, 1993, rejected the application for pre-emption on a finding that since the petitioner, who was the purchaser, was also an adjacent raiyat of the land in question, respondent No.5 could not maintain an application for pre-emption as against him. However, the appellate authority, namely, the Additional Collector, nalanda, Biharshariff, by his order dated 10-8-1984 (Annexure-2) allowed the appeal which order was affirmed in revision by the Additional Member, board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna, on 4-4-1985. The orders passed by the appellate and the revisional authority have been challenged in the instant writ petition by the petitioner, who was the purchaser.

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner purchased a plot of land measuring two kathas and odd pertaining to plot No.5124 in Khata No.318 from respondent No.6










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top