SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 698

NAGENDRA RAI
Sudhir Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ application for a direction to the respondents to appoint him on the post of constable, cancel the appointment of respondent no.7 as being discriminatory and arbitrary and make enquiry with regard to the irregularities committed in an appointment of the constables through an independent agency.

2. The facts of the case lie in the narrow compass. An advertisement being Advertisement no. 2/1995 was issued for selection of constables in all the districts in Bihar. The said advertisement was published in the Newspaper, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ application. In pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement a large number of candidates including the petitioner, who belong to the reserve category, applied for the said post to the district of Muzaf- muzffarpur. The petitioner appeared in the physical test and his height was measured as 510". After undergoing all the tests he was duly selected and his name was published on the notice Board of the Muzaffarpur reserve office. Thereafter, the appointments of constable in the district of Muzaffarpur were made on the basis of the said selection but


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top