SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 1201

PATNA HIGH COURT
Nagendra Rai, J.
Mohan Chaudhary
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 609 of 1990 ;
Decided On : NOVEMBER 16, 1999

Headnote:Bihar land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus land) Act, 1961-Section 10(3) read with sections 32A and 32B as amended by Act, 1982-The settled law is that the proceeding which has not attained finality has to proceeding afresh from the stage of section 10 of the Act and all the findings in the earlier proceeding are wiped out-The proceeding has to be decided afresh in the light of the provision contained under Section 32A & 328 of the Act-In the present Case no. proceeding under Section 5(1)(iii) was initiated at any point of time as such the authorities were not justified in treating the land transferred after 22.10.59 and prior to 9.9.70 as land of the land holder. (Paras 16, 21 & 22)

       AIR 1983 Pat 220, AIR 1985 Pat 38 (FB), 1997 (1) PLJR 497-Relied.

       Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961-Section 4(ee)-Family- The definition of family includes his or her spouse and minor children, major children, sons and daughters are not included in the definition of family and the land inherited by major sons and daughters in terms of the provision of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 cannot be clubbed together with the land held by the land holder. (Para 23)

       

Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. The petitioners, who are twelve in number, have filed the present application for issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 12.10.94 passed under section 10(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the Addl. Collector (Ceiling), Katihar in Case no. 106/1973-74 disposing of the objections filed to the draft statement published under section 10(1) of the Act, the order dated 31.1.89 passed by the appellate authority (the Collector, Katihar) in Ceiling Appl. No. 433/1985-86 dismissing the appeal against the aforesaid order and the resolution dated 3.10.89 passed by the Addl. Member, Board of Revenue in Revenue case no. 111/89 dismissing the revision against the aforesaid appellate order. Copies of the said orders have been annexed as Annexures 1, 2 & 3 respectively.

2. The facts necessary for disposal of the present application are that Awadheshwari Pd. Chaudhary (deceased), the father of the petitioners, owned large areas of agriculture land in village Binodpur, police station Korha, district Katihar. He died in the year, 1967 leaving behind his widow Rohini Devi, who died in 1987, and nine sons and three daughters, who are petitioners before this court. Land Ceiling Case No. 106/1973-74 was initiated against the petitioner Mohan Chaudhary and others and a draft statement under section 10(1) of the Act was issued and 760.67 acres of land was shown held by the family. Out of which 592.25 was shown as Class Ml land, 190.37 was shown as Class IV land and 57.12 was shown as Class V lands. An objection petition under section 10(3) was filed on behalf of the land holders. It was stated therein that total land possessed by the family is 402.73 acres and the family is entitled to 13 units, one unit for the widow of Awadheshwari Prasad Chaudhary and remaining for his children. The said objection was disposed of by the order dated 28.8.76 by the Addl. Collector and the assertion made on behalf of the petitioner that the total land was only 402.73 acres was accepted and eight units were allowed. One unit for the widow and the remaining for the petitioner nos. 1 to 7. The said order was challenged before the Collector, Katihar in Appl. no. 240/1976-77. While the appeal was pending the Act was amended by the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) (Amendment) Act, 1982(Bihar Act 55/1982). Apart from the other material amendment in the Act sections 32A & 32B of the Act were also inserted in the statute, which provided for abatement of the pending appeal, revision, review or reference arising out of the surplus land proceeding in which no final publication under section 11(1) of the Act has been made and the Collector shall proceed with the case afresh in accordance with the amended law.

3. In view of the aforesaid provision the appeal abated and the matter was remanded to the Addl. Collector to dispose of the same in terms of the amended provisions. The Addl. Collector thereafter passed a fresh order on 26.4.82 in the said proceeding after remand and upheld the earlier order dated 28.8.76. The petitioners preferred an appeal no. 263/1982-83 before the Collector, Katihar which after admission was dismissed for default on 14.11.82 and thereafter they filed an application for restoration which was dismissed on 4.1.83. They filed a revision application before the Member, Board of Revenue being revision no. 10/1983 and the Addl. Member, Board of Revenue allowed the revision application and remanded the matter to the Addl. Collector for afresh decision according to law.

4. After remand order a draft statement under section 10(1) of the Act was issued on 1.11.83, according to which the total land shown in possession of the land holder petitioners was 760.67 acres and six units were allowed and the remaining lands were declared as surplus land. The petitioners filed an obj

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top