SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 45

BISHESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, A.N.TRIVEDI
Tara Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kamala Gupta – Respondent


Judgment

B.P.SINGH, J.

1. This revision has been preferred by the petitioner-Jagdish Prasad who is the plaintiff in Probate Case No. 119 of 1992 in which he has prayed for the probate of a registered Will executed by Smt. Naulakho Devi widow of Shyam Lal Sah on 22-5-1974. The petitioner had filed an application under S. 151, C.P.C. before the Court of Sub-Judge IVth, Patna in Title Suit No. 480 of 1984 praying that the said suit be stayed till the disposal of Probate Case No. 119 of 1992. The petitioner is defendant No. 1 in title suit No. 480 of 1984. The Probate case has been filed by him as the executor of the Will and the father of one of the legatees. The learned subordinate Judge by his impugned order dated 16-12-1992 refused to stay Title Suit No. 480 of 1984 which is a suit for partition, but with a direction that the petitioner may renew his prayer after the preliminary decree, at the time of carving out separate takhtas, if by that time the probate case is not decided.

2. A few relevant facts may be noticed. It is not disputed that Ram Gulam Sah was the common ancestor of the parties. Ram Gulam Sah died leaving behind two sons, namely, Narain Sah and Shyamlal Sah. Narain S
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top