SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1041

R.M.PRASAD
Mahendra Jha – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this writ petition the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent Bank to pay the remaining 3/4th of the salary for the months of November and December, 1987 and January, 1988 and half of the salary for the period February, 1988 up to June, 1990 besides bonus, washing allowance, arrear of increment and arrear of 5th Pay Revision etc.

2. In short, the relevant facts are that the petitioner was suspended on 30th October, 1987 on account of institution of a criminal case against him. The said order of suspension was, however, revoked on 30th July, 1990. Finally in the said criminal case the petitioner was acquitted vide judgment dated 17.6.1995 (Annexure 1) as the prosecution failed to prove the case against him due to no evidence and the court discharged him from the liability of the bail bond. Thereafter, the petitioner filed representations (Annexure 5 series) before the authority concerned for payment of the aforementioned dues, but the respondent authority did not pass any order which compelled (sic).

3. It is not the case of the respondents that the petitioner was placed under suspension in contemplation or initiation of a departmental proceeding which










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top