SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1021

A.K.SINHA
Mosamatt Parmeshwari Devi – Appellant
Versus
Geeta Devi – Respondent


Judgment

1. Both the Cases are taken up together as both arise out of the common judgment passed in Succession Certificate case No. 150/97 and 173/97.

2. Heard the learned counsel for both the sides on the interlocutary applications filed on behalf of the respondent No. 1 Geeta Devi, in both the cases which are kept at flag Y, wherein, it has been stated that the appellant preferred the instant first appeals against the order dated 2-12-1999 passed in Succession Certificate Case No. 150/97 and 173/97 by the District Delegate-cum-Sub-Judge, Ist, Dhanabad, who has been delegated the powers of the District Judge under S. 388 of the Indian Succession Art. 1925 (hereinafter to be referred as Act). It has further been stated that under S. 388 (2) of the Act, the appeal will lie before the District Judge against the order passed by the Sub-ordinate Judge exercising the powers of the District Judge delegate. It has, therefore, been prayed that the memorandum of appeal may be returned to the appellants for presentation before the competent Court or in the alternative the stay granted by this Court vide order dated 28-6-2000 may be vacated.

3. A rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the appel










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top