SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Pat) 273

S.ROY, S.HODA
Bhim Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Lal Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s K.S. Mazumdar and R.S. Mazumdar.
For the Respondent: Mr. A.K. Sahani.

JUDGMENT

Satyeshwar Roy, J.

The respondent filed a suit valued at Rs. 17,600/- in the court of the Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad on 6-4-1987. The suit was decreed in his favour. The appellant, who was defendant in that suit, filed Title Appeal No. 24 of 1991 on 17.5.1991 in the court of the District Judge, Dhanbad against the judgment and decree of the trial. Court. The appeal was valued at Rs. 17,600/-. The appeal was listed before the District Judge on 28.6.1991 to dispose of the objection filed by the respondent about the maintainability of the appeal before that Court. The learned District Judge noticed that pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Judge to entertain appeal was raised from Rs. 10,000/- to Rs.50,000/- from May, 1987 and held that as the suit has been filed on 6.4.1987 i.e. prior to the raising of the pecuniary jurisdiction, the appeal did not lie before the District Judge. He relied on Kartik Nath Jha Vs. Smt Sheela Thakur : 1988 BBCJ 767 : He ordered for returning the memorandum of appeal. After receipt of the memorandum of appeal, the appellant has filed this appeal in this Court.

2. On 11.7.1991 the appeal was listed under the heading "For Orders". The appeal was or



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top