SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 1128

R.M.PRASAD, AFTAB ALAM, S.N.JHA
Rajendra Prasad Sah And Anil Kumar Ojha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Aftab Alam, J.

1. These two cases came to be heard before a Bench of three Judges on a reference made by me. Earlier while hearing these cases, sitting singly, I found it difficult to reconcile the views taken in two Division Bench decisions of this Court, one cited in support of the case of the petitioners and the other relied upon by the respondents. I accordingly, made an order of reference indicating the points of deviation in the two decisions.

2. The two petitioners, one in each of these two writ petitions were removed from service of the Bihar Co-operative Marketing Union, Ltd. (the Biscomaun, for short) by orders passed by its Administrator on the ground that their appointment was irregular and illegal. At the time of their removal they were given one months wages in lieu of one months notice (evidently to satisfy the requirements of the Bihar Shops and Establishments Act) but admittedly no show cause notice or an opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners before passing the order of their removal from service.

3. The petitioners filed, separate writ petitions submitting that their removal from service, without giving them any notice to show cause or an opp









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top