SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 195

PATNA HIGH COURT
S.N.Jha, J.
Dr.Rabindra Kumar Singh
Versus
Dr.Anil Kumar Sinha
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5460 of 1999 ; 5331 of 1999 ; 5449 of 1999 ; 5472 of 1999 ; 5452 of 1999 ; 5510 of 1999 ; 5707 of 1999 ; 5762 of 1999 ;
Decided On : FEBRUARY 04, 2000

The judgment emphasizes the significance of periodic recruitment to prevent the denial of opportunity to suitable candidates and ensure the appointment of the best available candidates.

Headnote:

Age Limit - Recruitment for Medical Officer in Bihar Health Service - Bihar Health Services (Basic Grade) Recruitment Rules, 1984 - Rule 6(a) - State of Bihar & ors. V/s. The Secretariat Assistant Successful Examinees Union of 1986 & ors., AIR 1994 Supreme Court, 736 = (1994) 1 SCC 126 : 1994(1) PLJR (SC) 41 - Bishun Dutta Jha & ors. V/s. B.P.S.C. & ors., 1992(2) PLJR 215

Fact of the Case:

The dispute relates to fixing the upper age limit for making applications for the post of Medical Officer in the Bihar Health Service. The petitioners raised concerns about the lack of recruitment over the years, leading to candidates becoming over-age and being deprived of the opportunity to seek appointment.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the lack of periodic recruitment resulted in denial of opportunity to suitable candidates, which was deprecated by the Supreme Court in previous cases. The court directed that the interim orders allowing the petitioners to appear in the examination be made absolute.

Issues: The issues revolved around the fixing of upper age limits, lack of periodic recruitment, and denial of opportunity to eligible candidates.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of holding examinations periodically to ensure equal opportunity for all eligible candidates and prevent the accumulation of vacancies leading to inferior appointments.

Final Decision: The interim orders allowing the petitioners to appear in the recruitment examination were made absolute, and the respondent-commission was directed to treat the petitioners as having duly appeared in the examination and work out their results.

Judgment

1. The dispute in these ten writ petitions relates to fixing the upper age limit of 35 years (in the case of general category candidates) on the cut-off date i.e. 1.10.98, for making applications for the post of Medical Officer in the Bihar Health Service.

2. Recruitment to the Bihar Health Services (Basic Grade) is governed by the Bihar Health Services (Basic Grade) Recruitment Rules, 1984 framed under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India. Rule 6(a) of the said Rules lays down (for the purpose of admission to the competitive examination and recruitment to the post) that a candidate must not have crossed 35 years of age or in the case of candidate belonging to the scheduled caste and scheduled tribes 40 years of age on the 1st day of October in which the competitive examination is to be held. From the impugned advertisement published in newspapers on or about 10.11.98 the upper age limit has been fixed at 35 years in the case of general category candidates, 37 years in the case of Backward class/Most Backward class category candidates, 38 years in the case of Backward class (Females) and 40 years in the case of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes candidates. It would,/thus, appear that the age limits fixed are in accordance with the rules and in that sense no objection can possibly be taken. The grievance of the petitioners, however, arises from the fact that during the last 9 years after 1989, no recruitment for the basic grade post of Medical Officer in the Bihar Health Service was made with the result that many candidates became over-age. This, if I may say, is the inevitable fall out of not making recruitment periodically. A candidate, who was not eligible on the cut-off date for the last recruitment on the ground of lesser age may become over age when the next recruitment takes place and he may thus be deprived of the opportunity to seek appointment. Though no such minimum age limit has been fixed in the case of recruitment to the basic grade post in the Bihar Health Services under Rule 6, the Rules lay down certain qualifications, such as, passing of the MBBS examination, internship etc. without which the candidate is not eligible to appear. A candidate qualified for recruitment at a comparative higher age may still find himsef in the same position of being deprived of the opportunity to apply for appointment and, thus, being considered for the post. The Supreme Court has deprecated the practice of not holding examination periodically resulting in denial of opportunity to the candidates, who may otherwise be suitable for appointment, in several cases. Reference may be made to one of them, State of Bihar & ors. V/s. The Secretariat Assistant Successful Examinees Union of 1986 & ors., AIR 1994 Supreme Court, 736 = (1994) 1 SCC 126 : 1994(1) PLJR (SC) 41. The case related to the appointment of Secretariat Assistants and had arisen from the State of Bihar itself. It is noteworthy that in the aforesaid case there was no statutory Recruitment Rule laying down holding of examination every year or so, as in the case of the Bihar Health Services (Basic Grade) Recruitment Rules. It would be useful to quote rule 4 of the said Rules as under: -

"The Government shall indicate the Commission every year the number of vacancies to be filled in by direct recruitment........"

3. It may be mentioned that similar provisions occur in the Recruitment Rules relating to other services, such as, the Bihar Civil Services (Executive Branch), in case of which examinations for recruitment are held periodically more or less.

4. It may be observed here that as a general principle there is no compulsion on the part of the Government to make appointment even though vacancies are available but at the same time if vacancies are allowed to accumulate and bulk appointments are made at a time, there may be possibility of candidates possessing inferior merit coming in. Where examinations are held periodically the chances are that the best







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top