SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Pat) 779

NAGENDRA RAI, D.P.S.CHOUDHARY
Ashutosh Kumar Vinayak – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. Both the appeals filed by the appelants are directed against the order dated 17.8.1999 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CWJC No. 9138 of 1998 by which the prayer made on behalf of the appellants to fill up 123 posts of Assistant Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the APP) from the panel prepared by the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) pursuant to Advertisement Nos.1 and 2 of 1996 has been rejected.

2. As the same order has been challenged in both the appeals, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by the common judgment.

3. Appellant No. 1 in both the appeals along with others filed a writ application for a direction to the respondent-State to send requisition to the Commission for sending recommendation for filling up 123 posts of APPs which were lying vacant in the State. During the pendency of the writ application, an intervention application was filed on behalf of the intervenors praying therein that they may be also heard at the time of hearing of the writ application because their interest are the same as that of the writ petitioners and accordingly they were al


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top