SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Pat) 71

NAGENDRA RAI
Sudhir Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
Sri Ashok Kumar Sah – Respondent


Judgment

Nagendra Rai, J.

1. The plaintiff-petitioner has filed the present Civil Rev sion under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) against the order dated 5-2-2001, passed by the Subordinate Judge V/s. Patnacity, in Title Suit No. 40 of 1997, rejecting his prayer for amendment of the plaint.

2. The facts necessary for disposal of the point involved in this case are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of contract against defendant-opposite parties No. 1 and 2 on the assertion that defendant-opposite party Mo. 1 has entered into an agreement on 10-1-1995 for sale of the property detailed in the plaint on consideration amount of Rs. 2,25,000, out of which he had already paid Rs. 1,70,000. The suit was filed on 24-9-1997. During the pendency of the suit on 6-1-2001, the plaintiff filed a petition for amendment of relief No. 1 in the plaint. The proposed amendment was:

in case there is any legal difficulty in decreeing the suit for specific performance of contract of sale, as prayed for in the suit, in that case a decree for refund of Rs. 1,70,000 paid by the plaintiff to the defendant be passed with interest

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top