SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Pat) 894

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. By this writ application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prayer made by the petitioner is to quash the Gazette Notification dated 7th January, 2000 (Annexure-1) whereby the State Government in exercise of its power under Section 9 (4) of the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 , has nominated respondent no. 8 as the Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Gaya.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, facts giving rise to the present writ application are that the State Government, in exercise of its power under Section 9 of the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), constituted the 8th Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Gaya (hereinafter referred to as the Committee) and nominated the Sub-divisional Officer an its Chairman. Thereafter, by the impugned order, respondent no. 8 who happens to be an elected member of the Committee, has been nominated as the Chairman. The petitioner who claims to be the voter of Agriculture Constituency No. 2 of the Committee, has challenged the said notification.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that once the Sub-Divisional officer was nominat








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top