SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Pat) 542

AFTAB ALAM
Md. Shamim Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner was appointed in 1976 as a driver in the Bihar State Sugar Development Corporation. He was working there when the Corporation (like many other Corporations and Boards in this State) started going down the hill. By and by its financial position became from bad to worse and at one stage the Corporation was not even able to pay salary to its employees. In those circumstances, an idea appears to have been mooted to send out the employees of the Corporation on deputation to different Government departments.

2. According to the petitioner in June, 1999 he too made a request for being sent out on deputation. At that time a request was received in the Corporation from the Relief & Rehabilitation Department, Government of Bihar asking for employees on deputation to work on certain posts, including the post of driver. The Corporaton forwarded the names of the petitioner (for the post of driver) and another employee, namely, Barkatullah Khan for the post of peon. Thereupon the Deputy Secretary to the Government in the Department of Relief & Rehabilitation issued an office order under his memo no. 1651, dated 16.8.99 (Annexure 2) posting the petitioner and Barkatullah

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top