R.S.GARG, RAJENDRA PRASAD
Chandrika Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
R.S.Garg, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant.
2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 7-10-2002 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W. J,C. No. 5004/2002 granting the writ application filed by Mahendra Rai setting aside the judgment and order dated 6-4-2002 passed by the Munsif, Raxaul at Motihari, East Champaran in Election Case No. 6/2000 allowing the election petition filed by the writ Respondent No. 4 setting aside the election of the present writ petitioner and declaring the writ Respondent No, 4/present appellant as the returned candidate, has filed this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.
3. The appellant-election petitioner filed an election petition before the Munsif inter alia submitting that the corrupt practices were writ large and as his request for recount was unceremoniously rejected by the Election Officer, the Munsif must interfere in the matter, direct recount of the votes, set aside the election and declare him elected. It appears that evidence was led but from the side of the election petitioner/ appellant no evidence was led to prove the fact that he had made an application for recount and that was unceremoniously rejected. Howeve
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.