SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Pat) 33

RADHA MOHAN PRASAD
Most. Sudama Devi – Appellant
Versus
Himanshu Shekhar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This Misc. Appeal is directed against the judgment in reversal dated 8th April, 1999 passed in Title Appeal No. 89 of 1994 arising out of the judgment and decree passed in Title Suit No. 135 of 1987, by learned Sub-Judge II,Patna.

2. The appellants are the plaintiffs. The suit was filed for declaration of title of the plaintiffs over the suit land fully described in Schedule I of the plaint and non-title of the defendants and further for holding that the sale deed dated 15.10.1986 executed by defendant 1st party in favour of defendant 2nd party is illegal, un-authorised and without any title and that the defendant 2nd party has not acquired any title and their possession over the suit land is that of a trespasser. Further prayer is for passing a decree for recovery of possession and mesne profit and also for permanent injunction restraining the defendants permanently from making any construction over the suit land.

3. Plaintiff-appellants succeeded in getting the decree against the defendants with a direction to defendant no. 3 to deliver vacant possession of the suit land to them within three months, failing which the plaintiffs were held to be entitled to recover the p










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top