SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Mad) 475

RAMAPRASADA RAO
Kaluvaroya Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Ganesa Pandithan – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Gopalaswamy Iyengar and S. Desikan, for Appellants; K. Parasaran, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- The above batch of civil miscellaneous appeals are against the order of the Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram in A. S. 151 of 1963, 27 of 1959 and 29 to 32 of 1959, whereunder he modified the judgment and decree of the District Munsif, Ramanathapuram, in the Original suits tried by the latter, and remanded the same on a particular aspect. The appeals before the lower Appellate Court were all connected and filed by the appellants against the respondents in those civil miscellaneous appeals. In all the suits the respondents claimed that the suit lands were pannai lands and therefore they had domain over the same and that the appellants are bound to recognise such right in them as iruwaramdars and liable to pay rent therefor. Both the Courts below found concurrently that the lands situated in the village of Karungulam is a pre-settlement dharmasanam grant which were iruwaram pannai lands of the respondents. On an examination of the oral and documentary evidence, the Courts below found that the suit lands are such lands of the respondents. They also found that the respondents collected swamibogam in respect of the suit lands which by itself is an important circumst




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top