SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Pat) 890

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
Suresh Chandra Mookerji – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar Through Vigilance – Respondent


Judgment

Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.

1. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.2.2003 passed by the Special Judge, Vigilance, South Bihar, Patna in Special Case No. 30 of 2000 whereby it has taken cognizance of the offence under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 109, 116, 119, 120B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and directed for issuance of summons against the petitioner and other accused persons.

2. One Pramod Singh Chandrawanshi had filed CWJC No. 7146 of 1998 (Parmod Singh vs. Chandrawanshi vs. State of Bihar and others) before this Court inter alia challenging the action of the Magadh University in declaring one Sikha Gupta of having passed the M.A.History examination in Sessions 1993-95 in Ist Class and its action in giving appointment to her as part time lecturer in A. N. College, Gaya. This Court while considering the grant of degree to said Shikha Gupta observed as follows:-

"The degree was given to respondent no. 7 evidently by fraudulent means. This is the inevitable conclusion in the light of the material finally coming before this Court; it is another matter that the University produced









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top