SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 1

NAGENDRA RAI
Most. Sushila Devi – Appellant
Versus
Lakhan Lal Sah – Respondent


Judgment

1. This is the second round of litigation before this Court at the instance of the tenant-petitioners.

2. The plaintiffs/opposite parties filed 0a suit for eviction on the ground of personal necessity (for opening a Kirana shop) in the suit premises which is a shop katra with one room and kitchen measuring about 32 north to south and about 16 east to west facing north of Bari Path situated at Moh: Machhua Toli, PS.Kadam Kuan town, bearing part of Holding No. 13210 C. 109, Circle No.29, Ward No. 17/12. The suit was decreed by judgment and decree dated 23rd June 2001 by the trial Court. The said judgment and decree was challenged by the tenant/petitioners by filing civil revision application being C.R. 1435 of 2001 under proviso to Section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The said civil revision application was allowed in part on 14.2.2003 [Reported in 2003 (2) PLJR 345]. This Court upheld the finding of the trial court with regard to reasonable and bonafide need of the plaintiffs opposite parties for eviction but remanded the matter to the trial Court to decide the question of partial eviction in te















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top