NAGENDRA RAI
Most. Sushila Devi – Appellant
Versus
Lakhan Lal Sah – Respondent
1. This is the second round of litigation before this Court at the instance of the tenant-petitioners.
2. The plaintiffs/opposite parties filed 0a suit for eviction on the ground of personal necessity (for opening a Kirana shop) in the suit premises which is a shop katra with one room and kitchen measuring about 32 north to south and about 16 east to west facing north of Bari Path situated at Moh: Machhua Toli, PS.Kadam Kuan town, bearing part of Holding No. 13210 C. 109, Circle No.29, Ward No. 17/12. The suit was decreed by judgment and decree dated 23rd June 2001 by the trial Court. The said judgment and decree was challenged by the tenant/petitioners by filing civil revision application being C.R. 1435 of 2001 under proviso to Section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The said civil revision application was allowed in part on 14.2.2003 [Reported in 2003 (2) PLJR 345]. This Court upheld the finding of the trial court with regard to reasonable and bonafide need of the plaintiffs opposite parties for eviction but remanded the matter to the trial Court to decide the question of partial eviction in te
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.