SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Pat) 696

R.N.PRASAD, RAVI S.DHAVAN
Md. Mustaque – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Ravi S.Dhavan, J.

1. This issue raises an important point on what actually should be the content of local self Government with civic functions. What is urbanisation about? Is it not a civic function with local self Government? It is local Government by the people, for the people and of the people. The attack in the present petition is on the Bihar Regional Development Authority Act, 1981 .

2. As long as 73rd and 74th amendments to the Constitution had not arrived, the encouragement to even debate such issues was not available. Not a single argument has been advanced to resist the proposition that the content of the development authority within the area of a municipality has to with elected representatives. If the Government is local Government in its content then why should peoples representatives be eliminated in participating in municipal Government.

3. Circumstances of the set up which has been structured in Bihar (and Uttar Pradesh) will be better understood in its back ground. The supersession of local self Government in Uttar Pradesh began at the end of the decade of 1960s. In Bihar it happened by an ordinance. In Bihar the process started in 1971. In the context of B

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top