SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 1083

SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
Md. Izharul Haque – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard learned counsel fdr the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for A.G. is present.

2. Petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 6193 in which he had claimed post retirement benefits on the basis of his service for the period November, 1951 to December, 1972 and he did not want credit for the period 1.1.1973 to 31.1.92 during which he was continuously absent from service. That writ petition was disposed of by order dated 17.2.2003 (Annexure-15) with direction that petitioner may submit a representation before the concerned respondent, the Chief Medical Officer-cum-Civil Surgeon, Rohtas, who shall consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass orders in accordance with law and shall also consider the question of delay on the part of petitioner in ventilating his grievance. By order dated 9.7.05 the concerned Chief Medical Officer has rejected petitioners prayer for interest over pension and gratuity allowed to the petitioner.

3. On behalf of petitioner two grievances were raised. Firstly, it was submitted that petitioners pension should have been fixed not on the actual pay received by him during last ten months

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top