SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Pat) 991

NAVIN SINHA
Lakshmi Kant – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner would be aggrieved by the order of cognizance dated 21.5.2002 as also the proceeding in Complaint Case No. 686(C) of 2002 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 420 of the Penal Code.

3. The short facts to be noticed would be that for hire charges of a vehicle the petitioner would have given a cheque on 15.12.2001 for a sum of Rs. 15,000/-which would have been deposited by the complainant in the bank on 7.1.2002 when he would have learnt of its being dishonoured due to insufficient fund on 9.1.2002. A notice would then have been sent to the petitioner on 11.1.2002 under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the N.I. Act). The present complaint would then have been filed on 19.4.2002.

4. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in terms of Section 142(b) read with Section 138(c) of the N.I. Act the complaint was to be initiated within one month from the date the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top