PATNA HIGH COURT
Aftab Alam and S.K.Katriar JJ.
B.S.Enterprises
Versus
State Of Bihar
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14725 of 2005 ;
Decided On : NOVEMBER 08, 2006
Rule 56 - Bihar Value Added Tax - Sec. 16(1)(d) - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the interpretation of Rule 56 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rule, 2005 in relation to the discretion of the prescribed authority to extend the period for furnishing details of stocks for claiming input tax credit under Sec. 16(1)(d) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The court highlighted the provisions of Sec. 16(1)(d) and Rule 56, emphasizing the conditions and restrictions for claiming input tax credit and the absence of discretion for relaxation or extension of the time fixed under the rule.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved four writ petitions where the petitioners sought an affirmative answer to whether Rule 56 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rule, 2005 could be read to give the prescribed authority the discretion to extend the period for furnishing details of stocks for claiming input tax credit under Sec. 16(1)(d) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The petitioners argued that any other view would render Rule 56 bad and illegal for being destructive of the right granted by Sec. 16(1)(d) of the Act. The Revenue maintained that the answer to the question could only be in the negative, as it would amount to substituting the Court's will for the mandate of the law.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that Rule 56 did not envisage any relaxation of the period of time fixed under it and that the plain language of Secs. 16(1)(d) and 95 of the Act and Rule 56 did not allow for any relaxation or extension of time by the prescribed authority. The court emphasized that the grant of input tax credit under Sec. 16(1)(d) of the Act is subject to a number of conditions, restrictions, and limitations, and that Rule 56 fixed a cut-off date instead of laying down a period of limitation.
Issues: The main issue was whether Rule 56 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rule, 2005 could be read to give the prescribed authority the discretion to extend the period for furnishing details of stocks for claiming input tax credit under Sec. 16(1)(d) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Rule 56 did not allow for any relaxation or extension of time by the prescribed authority and emphasized that the grant of input tax credit under Sec. 16(1)(d) of the Act is subject to a number of conditions, restrictions, and limitations. The court also highlighted that Rule 56 fixed a cut-off date instead of laying down a period of limitation.
Final Decision: All the four writ petitions were dismissed by the court.
Aftab Alam, J.
1. Whether Rule 56 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rule, 2005 can be so read as to give the prescribed authority the discretion to extend, in appropriate cases, the period for furnishing details of stocks for claiming input tax credit under Sec. 16(1)(d) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 ? This is the common question arising in all the four writ petitions.
2. The petitioners in the four cases pray for answering the question in the affirmative and on their behalf, it is submitted that any other view would render Rule 56 bad & illegal for being destructive of the right granted by Sec. 16(1)(d) of the Act. The Revenue, on the other hand, maintains that the answer to the question can only be in the negative, otherwise it would amount to substituting the Courts will for the mandate of the law.
3. The facts and circumstances in which the above question arises can be briefly described as follow. On 2.3.2005, the Governor of Bihar promulgated Bihar Value Added Tax Ordinance, 2005 (Bihar Ordinance No. 1 of 2005). It was published in the Official Gazette on 4.3.2005. sec. 1(3) of the Ordinance provided that that section would come into force at once but the remaining provisions of the Ordinance would come into force on such date(s) as the State Government might appoint by notification in the Official Gazette and different dates might be appointed for different provisions. In terms of that provision, the State Government issued notification No. S.O.18, dated 18.03.2005, for enforcement of Sections 2 to 99 of the Ordinance with effect from 1.4.2005. sec. 93 of the Ordinance contained the rule-making power and authorised the State Government to make rules, subject to the condition of previous publication. In exercise of that power, the State Government framed the Bihar Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 under S.O.26, dated 24.03.2005. But at that time, the condition of previous publication of the rules was somehow overlooked. By virtue of notification, dated 18.03.2005, all the provisions of VAT Ordinance came into force on 1.4.2005 and consequently the previous Act holding the field, namely, the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 was repealed by sec. 94 of the Ordinance. On 23.06.2005, the State enacted the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (Bihar Act No. 27 of 2005) which received the assent of the President of India on 23.06.2005 and on the same date it was published in the Gazette of India (Extra Ordinary). Section 1(3) of the Act provided that it would be deemed to have come into force on the 1st day of April, 2005. Later, a number of amendments were introduced in the Act by Bihar Finance Act, 2006 (Act 7 of 2006). The amendment Act received the assent of the President of India on 19.04.2006 and it was published in the Bihar Gazette (Extra Ordinary) on the same date. While introducing a number of amendments in the Act, it seems that the omission to follow the condition of previous publication in the making of rules was also realised. The lacuna was corrected by amending sec. 93 and removing the condition of previous publication retrospectively with effect from 1.4.2005.
4. The essence of VAT is said to lie in giving set-off for the tax paid earlier and this object is given effect to by providing for input tax credit/rebate. The provisions relating to input tax credit are contained in sec. 16 of the Act. It is a long section dealing with the different ways in which a claim for input tax credit may arise and may be claimed by the dealer. For the present, we are concerned with input tax credit on goods lying in stock with the dealer on 1.4.2005 that had already suffered the incidence of tax under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 before the VAT Act came into force. sec. 16(1)(d) reads as follows: Input Tax Credit : (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, an input tax credit as provided in this section shall be claimed by a registered dealer, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed, on sales of goods in the foll
Collector Of Monghyr And Ors. V/s. Keshav Prasad Goenka And Ors.
Dalchand V/s. Municipal Corporation, Bhopal And Anr.
G.D. Kumar & Sons V/s. The State Of Bihar And Ors.
Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd. V/s. Commercial Tax Officer And Ors.
P.C.H. Business V/s. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department And Ors.
P.T. Rajan V/s. T.P.M. Sahir And Ors.
P.V. Usman V/s. Food Inspector, Tellichery Municipality
Sales Tax Officer, Ponkunnam And Anr. V/s. K.I. Abraham
Shaikh Salim Haji Abdul Khayumsab V/s. Kumar And Ors.
Shreenath And Anr. V/s. Rajesh And Ors.
State Of Mysore And Ors. V/s. Mallick Hashim And Co. Etc
Bihar Foundary & Casting V/s. The State Of Bihar And Ors.
Mcdowell & Company Ltd., Hathidah V/s. The State Of Bihar And Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.