SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Pat) 1502

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
Mahesh Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The present writ application had been filed by the three petitioners-Mahesh Ram, Ganesh Ram and Chandradeo Ram. It may be mentioned that Mahesh Ram (petitioner no. 1) died during the pendency of this writ application and has been substituted by his mother (Bachhi Devi), his father already having pre-deceased, brother Ganesh Ram being on record already. The three petitioners were made accused in Matihani RS. Case No. 59 of 2000, which was instituted on 9.10.2000 under Sections 302, 201, 307 and 353/34, IPC instituted against unknown. They were arrested, charge-sheeted but later, after eight months released and later discharged as no offence at all was committed.

2. The FIR having been registered on self statement by Shri Pramod Kumar Jha, who was the officer incharge of Matihani police station, immediately endorsing the investigation to Rajendra Prasad Mahto, A.S.I., Matihani police station for investigation. All these people including the Superintendent of Police and Deputy Superintendent of Police, Begusarai have been made parties to the present writ application by name. The then Superintendent of Police is respondent no. 2 and the investigating officer is respondent no






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top