SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 662

S.N.HUSSAIN
Ram Prakash Mahto – Appellant
Versus
Tar Kishore Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

1. This election petition has been filed by Dr. Ram Prakash Mahto under the provisions of Sections 80 and 80-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for the sake of brevity) challenging the election of the sole respondent Tar Kishore Prasad who has been declared elected for 14th Bihar Legislative Assembly from 142, Katihar Assembly Constituency for which election was held on 26-10-2005.

2. The admitted facts of the matter are that a notification was issued on 28-9-2005 calling for the voters of 142 Katihar Assembly Constituency to elect their representative of 14th Bihar Legislative Assembly fixing 5-10-2005 as the last date for filing nomination within which period altogether 10 candidates, including the sole petitioner and the sole respondent, filed their nomination papers, out of which the petitioner was an official candidate of Rashtriya Janta Dal political party, whereas the sole respondent filed his nomination as an official candidate of Bhartiya Janta Party political party and after scrutiny on 6-10-2005, the nomination papers were found valid and were accepted and a list of validly nominated candidates was published by the























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top