SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Pat) 374

MRIDULA MISHRA
Ramdeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. Prayer of the petitioners in all these applications are same, as such, they have been heard together and being disposed of by a common order.

3. Initially these applications were filed for quashing the first information report of Laheri P.S. Case No. 88 of 2006 (Special Case No. 30 of 2006) and also the investigation in connection with the instant first information report. During the pendency of these applications, on completion of investigation, charge-sheet was submitted and cognizance taken under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act against all the petitioners vide order, dated 10.7.2007, by the Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna. Interlocutory applications were filed by the petitioners for amending the prayer and for additional relief for quashing the charge-sheet and order, taking cognizance, dated 10.7.2007. Interlocutory applications were allowed and the amended prayer is for quashing the charge sheet and order taking cognizance, dated 10.7.2007, by the Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna, in Special Case No. 30 of 2006. Petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 30150 o





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top