SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Pat) 1024

SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, V.N.SINHA, ANJANA PRAKASH
Sunita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Prem Kumar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, A. C. J.

1. The issue referred to the full Bench for adjudication at the very initial stage of filing of present appeals is whether these appeals under Sec.19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), preferred against the judgment and order of a Family Court should be treated and recorded as First Appeal or as Miscellaneous appeal. This issue being an issue of law does not require going into the facts of the appeals.

2. However, some facts which may be helpful in deciding the issue in question, relate to Miscellaneous Appeal No.191 of 2009 and are noticed in brief. This appeal has been filed against an order dated 19-2-2009 passed in Misc. Case No.11 of 2000 by Principal Judge, Family Court, muzaffarpur whereby and whereunder the judgment and decree dated 7-10-1966 obtained by the appellants husband against the private respondent, the wife of the appellant has been set aside on accepting the plea of the respondent wife that the ex parte judgment and decree of divorce had been obtained without notice to her. The result of the order under appeal is to revive the original suit No.12 of 1964 which has to be decided afresh in accor



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top