1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2.

2. Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are the parents of the complainants husband. Petitioner nos. 3 and 4 are the younger brother and married sister of the complainants husband respectively.

3. The complainant, namely, Swati Kumari was married with Shailendra Kumar the son of the petitioner nos. 1 and 2. Due to some matrimonial incompatibility she had filed complaint case before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah. In which the complainant and other witnesses were examined on S.A. and the Court vide order dated 23.6.2007 had directed for issuance of processes upon the accused persons. The petitioners are aggrieved from that order.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no concern with the family affairs of complainant and her husband. The complainant after marriage started living separately in Jamnagar in the district of Jalgaon (Maharastra) where her husband was working in the State Bank of India. The petitioner no. 4 is the married sister of the complainants husband and the petit