SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 2287

RAKESH KUMAR
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. Heard Shri Raju Giri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 3.1.2006 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in G.R. No. 523 of 2003/Tr. No. 1572 of 2006 arising out of Buxar (Industrial Area) P.S. Case No. 27 of 2003. By the said order, learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 448, 341, 379, 380, 465, 468, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Short fact of the case is that opposite party No. 2, Most. Sahnaz Bugum submitted a written report before the Officer- in-Charge, Industrial Area Police Station, Buxar disclosing therein that a plot in the Industrial Area, Buxar was leased out by the Industrial Area Development Authority to her husband. The plot in question was leased out to the husband of the informant for 99 years. Over the said plot, an industrial unit was established by her husband in the name and style of Liberty Dresses. It was disclosed that the hu








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top