PATNA HIGH COURT
Dipak Misra and Shiva Kirti Singh JJ.
State Of Bihar
Versus
Shahida Hassan Wife Of Afran Hassan
Letter Patent Appeal No. 373 of 2004
Decided On : JANUARY 27, 2010
Resignation - Pension Entitlement - Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 Rule 101(a), Rule 135, Bihar Service Code Rule 74(b)(i) - The court analyzed the provisions of Rule 101(a) and Rule 135 of the Bihar Pension Rules, and Rule 74(b)(i) of the Bihar Service Code. The court emphasized the distinction between resignation simpliciter and resignation for misconduct, insolvency, and insufficiency. It held that denial of pension after completion of qualifying service would violate constitutional provisions and that the writ petitioner was entitled to pension, gratuity, leave encashment, and G.P.F.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent, a Medical Officer under the Health Department, Government of Bihar, resigned from service after completing more than thirteen years and six months. The State Government accepted her resignation but did not pay her pension and other post-retiral benefits. The court analyzed the provisions of the Bihar Pension Rules and the Bihar Service Code to determine the entitlement to pension and other benefits.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent was entitled to pension, gratuity, leave encashment, and G.P.F. after completing the qualifying service, and that the denial of these benefits would violate constitutional provisions.
Issues: The core issue was whether the services of an employee, who has fulfilled the qualifying service, can be forfeited based on Rule 101(a) of the Bihar Pension Rules.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the distinction between resignation simpliciter and resignation for misconduct, insolvency, and insufficiency. It held that denial of pension after completion of qualifying service would violate constitutional provisions and that the writ petitioner was entitled to pension, gratuity, leave encashment, and G.P.F.
Final Decision: The court allowed the State's appeal and directed that the respondent was entitled to all retiral benefits.
Dipak Misra, J.
1. Regard being had to the commonality of controversy in both the appeals it was thought apposite to hear them analogously and, accordingly, they were heard together and are disposed of by singular order. It is imperative to state the factual matrix of each case separately although the interpretations of rules involved are the same.
2. In L.P.A. No. 373 of 2004 the expose of facts are that the respondent had joined the service as Medical Officer under Health Department, Government of Bihar on 15.7.1981 and submitted her resignation from the said service which was accepted by the State Government with effect from 21.1.1995. Though her resignation was accepted, she was not paid gratuity, full pension, G.P.F., group insurance, leave encashment and arrears of salary. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid action of the State Government she preferred writ petition forming the subject matter of C.W.J.C. No. 1678 of 2003. It was contended in the petition that she had completed more than thirteen years and six months service and, hence, was entitled for pension and other post retiral benefits under clause 18 of Appendix 6, contained in Part-ll of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 (for short the Rules) which prescribes ten years of minimum service as qualifying service for payment of pensionary benefits. The stand put forth by the writ petitioner was resisted by the State and its functionaries stating, inter alia, she is not entitled to get pension and gratuity, etc. As far as arrear salary is concerned it is pleaded that a sum of Rs. 38,659/- had been handed over to her counsel on 13.5.2003. In opposition of the said stand, it was urged that her services stood, forfeited under Rule 101(a) of the Rules and, therefore, no fault can be found with the decision taken by the State Government.
3. Learned Single Judge upon analysing the provisions, namely, Rule 101(a) and Rule 135 of the Rules and Rule 74(b)(i) of the Bihar Service Code (for short the Code) and placing reliance on the decisions rendered in Tapan Kumar Chatterjee V/s. The State of Bihar & Ors., 1998(1) P.L.J.R. 707, Union of India & Ors. vs. Braj Nandan Singh & Anr., 2003(3) P.L.J.R. 409 and Union of India & Ors. vs. Lt. Col. P.S. Bhargava, (1997)2 S.C.C. 28 came to hold that there is a distinction between resignation simpliciter and resignation which is given for misconduct, insolvency and insufficiency; that Rule 101(a) of the Rules is contradictory to the provision contained in Rule 135 of the Rules: that it is difficult to reconcile Rule 135 of the Rules with Rule 74(b)(i) of the Code; and that when there is manifest contradiction, construction should be placed which emphasises the meaning of the words; that once resignation has been accepted, denial of pension after completion of qualifying service would be violative of Articles 14 & 16(1) of the Constitution of India; and that writ petitioner is entitled to get pension, gratuity, leave encashment and G.P.F.
4. In L.P.A. No. 688 of 2009 the predecessor-in-interest of the present appellants had invoked the jurisdiction of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 8869 of 2003 assailing letter no. 578 dated 10.6.2003 issued by the Senior Accounts Officer of Accountant General, Bihar by which his claim for pension was rejected. The stand of the original petitioner was that he was entitled to pension and gratuity, as his resignation was accepted with effect from 7.5.1977 and the same should not be treated as a resignation but an application for voluntary retirement. During the pendency of writ petition, the original writ petitioner expired and the present appellants impleaded themselves to prosecute the lis. As is evincible from the facts brought on record, the original petitioner was appointed as a teacher in the Middle School, Shirnia on 1.4.1949. The said school was taken over by the State Government with effect from 1.1.1971. In the month of June, 1976 he was transferred from the Middle School, Shirnia to the Middle Schoo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.