SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Pat) 1940

JYOTI SARAN
Anil Kumar Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Electricity Board – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. The issue raised in the writ petition is whether the services rendered by the petitioner while posted in the State Government w.e.f. 12.8.1970 to 4.6.1976 would count as qualifying service for the purpose of calculation of pension and pensionary entitlements since after his appointment in the respondent Bihar State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board), in view of the stipulation present in the memorandum of the Central Govt. dated 29.8.1984 (Annexure-10) adopted and followed by the Board in the Circular dated 14.2.1992 (Annexure-14).

2. With the consent of the parties the matter has been taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3. Heard Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha for the petitioner, Mr. Subhash Kishore Verma for the respondent Electricity Board and its authorities and Mr. Girijesh Kumar, learned Assisting Counsel to Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Additional Advocate General No. 3 for the State.

4. Mr. Subhash Kishore Verma, learned counsel representing the respondent Electricity Board and its authorities at the very outset raised a preliminary objection as regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on grounds that the matter stood conclu































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top