SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 38

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Amarendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Anjali Devi – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.

1. This First Appeal is directed against the Judgment/ Order dated 22.03.1996 recording compromise and the final decree signed on 06.04.1996 by Sri Mahendra Narayan Singh, the leaned Subordinate Judge-I, Patna in Title Partition Suit No. 37 of 1994.

2. It appears that originally the Defendant No. 1, Devnandan Singh, had filed this Appeal. On his death, the present Appellant, Amrendra Kumar, who was Respondent No. 1 in this First Appeal, was transposed as sole Appellant. This Amrendra Kumar is son of original Appellant Devnandan Singh. The present Appellant Sri Amrendra Kumar filed aforesaid partition suit claiming 1/5th share in Schedule I and II properties mentioned in the plaint. In the said suit, the Defendant No. 1 was father of the Plaintiff, i.e., Sri Devnandan Sinha. The said Devnandan Sinha Defendant No. 1 had two wives, namely, Smt. Anjali Devi and Smt. Chandrakanta Sinha who were Defendant-Respondent No. 2 and 3. The 3 sons from the second wife Chndra Kanta Sinha are the Plaintiff-Appellant Amrendra Kumar and Defendant-Respondent No. 4 and 5, namely, Dr. Nirmal Kumar and Devendra Kumar respectively.

3. It appears that on 27.09.1995 an alleged
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top