SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 1032

AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
Dr. Rai Murari, Gopal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Patna University – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

1. Private respondent No.4 was appointed as a Principal of what is known as Bihar National College (B.N. College), Patna, which is stated to be a constituent college of Patna University. The notification by virtue of which the private respondent came to be appointed is dated 3.6.2009 and is Annexure-3 to the writ application. This notification has been issued under the so-called orders of the Vice-Chancellor of Patna University under the signature of the Registrar of Patna University. His appointment is under challenge in the present writ application on many a grounds but primarily that respondents appointment is not in accordance with the Patna University Act, 1976 and the related statutes notified from time to time as also that respondent No.4 lacks basic eligibility in terms of the advertisement.

2. Petitioner No.1 is stated to be a Professor of Economics working under Patna University and petitioner No.2 is a Professor and Head of Department of Geology in B.N. College and both of them were applicants to the post and have vital interest in the matter as to who and how he is occupying the post of a Principal of the College in question. Whether he has the requisite qualif

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top