SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Pat) 1038

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Ram Chandra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Mina Devi – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.

1. The Defendant has filed this first appeal against the judgment and decree dated, 26th September, 2006 passed by Sri Radheyshyam Singh, the learned 4th Subordinate Judge, Bhojpur, Ara in Title Suit No. 593 of 2002, whereby, the learned Court below decreed the alternative prayer of the Plaintiff-Respondent in the suit for specific performance of contract.

2. The Plaintiff-Respondent filed the aforesaid Title Suit No. 593 of 2002 praying for specific performance of contract dated, 22nd December, 1999 on receiving balance consideration amount of Rs. 76,000 and in the alternative prayed for a decree for recovery of Rs. 2,24,000 with interest @ Rs. 2 per month from the date of agreement dated, 22nd December, 1999.

3. The Plaintiff prayed the aforesaid relief on the facts inter alia which may be briefly stated thus, that the parties were knowing each other from before. The Defendant-Appellant had taken loan at the time of marriage of his daughter and to repay the same he agreed to sell the suit house for Rs. 3,00,000. The Plaintiff-Respondent agreed to purchase the same and paid Rs. 2,24,000 as earnest money and a Mahadanama was executed in presence of the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top