SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Pat) 103

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Panna Lal Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Gupta – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 04.02.2011 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Buxar in pre-litigation case No.18 of 2011.

3. It appears that a pre-litigation case No.18 of 2011 was filed by the applicant-respondent against the opposite party-respondent in the Permanent Lok Adalat without making the present petitioner a party in the pre-litigation case. The petitioner claimed himself to be the full brother of the applicant and the pre-litigation case was filed for partition of the joint family property. The parties to the pre-litigation case compromised and on the basis of the compromise, the Lok Adalat passed the award. The petitioner filed an application for setting aside the said award on the ground that he was not made party in the pre-litigation case and that the respondent by playing fraud on the Permanent Lok Adalat obtained the Award. By the impugned order, the Permanent Lok Adalat rejected the application on the ground that the Permanent Lok Adalat has no jurisdiction to entertain the said Misc. case.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top