SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Pat) 598

S.K.KATRIAR
Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Shambhu Nath Prasad – Respondent


ORDER

Head Mr. Vindhyachal Singh for the petitioner and Mr. Uday Shanker Sharan Singh for the opposite party.

2. The petitioner is the defendant in a suit for eviction. This civil revision application is directed against the order dated 14.9.98 passed by the learned Munsif 1st, Hajipur, in Eviction suit no. 6/97 (Shambhu Prasad vs. Vijay Kumar) whereby the petitioner's defence has been struck off within the meaning of section 15 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 on account of delay in deposit of rent for the month of May 1998.

3. The trial court by its order dated 16.4.98 directed the defendant to pay current rent of each previous month by the first week of next month. The defendant defaulted in payment of rent of May 1998. The defendant had remitted per money order the rent for the month of May 1998 and June 1998 together on 6.7.98. Rent of May 1998 ought to have been remitted by the first week of June 1998. There was thus delay of exactly one month in remitting the rent for May 1998. Thereafter the plaintiff filed an application dated 2.7.98 to strike off the defence of the defendant in terms of section 15 of the B.B.C. Act. That application has be





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top