HIGH COURT OF PATNA
S.B. SINHA &. R.N. PRASAD, JJ.
Umesh Thakur (CWJC No. 3924/92)
Niranjan Kumar Sinha (CWJC No. 5445/92)
Sham Nandan Prasad & ors (CWJC No. 6561/92)
Ramanaj Prasad Sinha (CWJC No. 8022/92)
Mumtaz Hassan Arfi & anr. (CWJC No. 8023/92)
Dr. Nasib Lal Sinha & ors. (CWJC No. 8102/92)
Sodhir Kumar Mandal & anr. (CWJC No. 8381/92)
Mahatma Gandhi Sahakari Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd., Hajipur & another (CWJC No. 8438/92)
Pradip Kumar Singh alias Data Ram Singh (CWJC 8470/92)
Suresh Jha (CWJC No. 8487/92)
Sukhdeo Yadav (CWJC No. 8488/92)
Ramjatan Sao (CWJC No. 8491/92)
Ram Nandan Prasad (CWJC No. 8500/92)
Abhai Shankar Prasad Sinha & anr. (CWJC No. 8513/92)
Brajesh Kumar (CWJC No. 8547/92)
Chandeshwar Narayan Verma (CWJC No. 8731/92)
Dadbibal Yadav (CWJC No. 9018/92)
Ram Chander Prasad & anr. (CWJC No.9045/92)
Md. Saleem (CWJC No. 9151/92)
Uday Kant Jha (CWJC No. 9364/92)
Sachida Nand Singh (CWJC No. 9395/92)
Lalmani Prasad Gupta (CWJC No. 9434/92)
Indradeo Singh & anr. (CWJC No, 9518/92)
Sheo Prakash Singh (CWJC No. 9578/92)
Syed Qnazi Fakhre Alam (CWJC No.9713/22)
Bihar State Deed Writers Association Branch Lakhisarai & anr. (CWJC No. 9759/92) Abhay Kumar Shroff(CWJC No. 9884/12)
Raj Nath Singh & anr. (CWJC No. 10370/92)
Bilat Yadav (CWJC No. 5859/92)
Anuj Kumar Sinha (CWJC No. 7836/92)
Rajesh Kumar Saraff (CWJC No. 2897/93) - Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Bihar & ors. - Respondents in all the cases
CWJC Nos. 3924, 5445, 6561, 8022, 8023, 8102, 8381, 8438, 8470, 8487, 8488, 8491, 8500, 8513, 8547, 8731, 9018, 9045, 9151, 9364, 9395, 9434, 9518, 9578, 9713, 9759, 9884, 10370, 5859, 7836 of 1992 and 2897 of 1993.
Decided On : 9.3.94
Indian Stamp Act, 1897, Sec 47A (as amended by Bihar Act 15 of 1988 and further amended by Bihar Amendment Act, 1991) and Bihar Instruments Valuation Rules, 1991,
Rule 5 - by State amendment, registering authorities were required to refer the document for assessing, market value of the land to the Collector for the purposes of Payment of proper duty - amendment, challenged on the ground of Incompetency of the State Legislature to legislate and also on the grounds of being ultra vires to Art 14 of the Constitution ,of India and that it empowers the Collector to collect evidence behind the back of the part) In determining the 'market value' – the provisions of the Stamp Act provides for the manner in which evasion of duty has to be prohibited - amendments made by other States noticed - provisions of Sec 47 A is attracted where the parties deliberately undervalue the properties with a view to defraud Govt. - amendments within the competence of the State Legislature and not unreasonable - a provision conferring discretionary power can not be struck only on apprehension of its being misused - the Registering authority is not merely to act as post office - the market value can not be a fixed sum and conferring any power upon any authority to fix market value of any property can not be brought within Inflexible rule as determination of market value of property is a Judicial act - rule 5 negate the principle of natural justice and makes a mockery of determination of market value by an authority who is required to discharge judicial function and has to be held ultra vires Art 14 of Constitution of India - 1993(3) SCC 723 ref, 1984(2) Kar. L.J. 314 rel. on.(Paras 39, 45, 53, 55, 56, 60, 65 & 68)
In all these writ applications, petitioners have questioned the vires of Section 47A of the Indian Stamp Act (hereinafter called and referred for the sake of brevity as the said Act) as amended by the Bihar Act, 18 of 1988 which was subsequently amended by Bihar Amendment Act, 1991 as also the Rules flamed by the State of Bihar known as Bihar Instrument Valuation Rules, 1991, published in the Bihar Gazette dated 27.12.1991 The petitioners have also questioned the respective orders passed by different registering authorities whereby and whereunder he refused to register the instruments presented to him, Inter alia, on the ground that the valuation mentioned therein does not reflect the market value of the property which are the subject matter of the transaction in question.
2. In view of the pure question of law involved in these writ applications, it is not necessary to state the fact of the matters in details.
Suffice it to say that the writ petitioners intended to transfer their right, title and interest in favour of third parties.
3. In most of the writ petitions, the petitioners presented deeds of sale before the concerned registering authorities but the said authorities without registering the instruments sent the same to the Collector concerned on the ground that the amount of consideration shown in the respective sale deeds is much less than the market value thereof and the Collector in turn has issued notices to them as to why steps should not be taken for realisation or the deficit amount of stamp duty.
4. Before considering the rival contentions raised by the parties the provisions of the said Act and the Rules framed thereunder, which are necessary for the purpose of disposal of these applications, may be noticed.
The said Act was enacted to consolidate and amend the law related to stamps.
5. The words ‘duly stamped' has been defined in section 2 (11) of the Act which reads as follows;
“Duly stamped" as applied to an instrument, means that the Instrument bears an adhesive or Impressed stamp of not less than the proper amount and such stamp has been affixed or used in accordance with law for time being in force In India;”
The word ‘Instrument' has been defined in section 2 (14) and 'Conveyance' in section 2 (10) of the said Act which lead as follows.
“Instrument" includes every document by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded;
"Conveyance" includes a conveyance on sale and every instrument by which property, whether movable or immovable, is transferred Inter vives and which is not otherwise specifically provided for by Schedule I or by Schedule I-A, as the case may be”
6. Section 3 of the said Act is the charging section which reads thus ;
"3 Instruments chargeable with duty - Subject to the provisions of this Act and the exemption contained ID Schedule I, the following instrument shall be chargeable with duty of the amount Indicated in that Schedule as the proper duty therefore, respectively, that is to say-
(a) every instrument mentioned in that Schedule which, not having been previously executed by any person, is executed in India on or not after the first day on July, 1899,
(b) every bill of exchange payable otherwise than on demand or promissory note drawn or made out of India on or after that day and accepted or paid, or presented for acceptance or payment, or endorsed, transferred or otherwise negotiated, In India: and
(c) every instrument (other than a bill of exchange or promissory note) mentioned in that Schedule, which, not having been previously executed by any person is executed out of India on or after that day, relates to any property, situate, or to any matter or thing done or to be done, In India and is received in India.
7. Section 47 A of the Act was inserted by Bihar Act No.15 of 1988 of the Indian Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1988 which reads as follows :
"47A. Instrument of conveyance.-(1) where the registering officer a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.