S.B. Sinha, J.

All these three appeals involving common question of law and fact and being between the same parties were directed to be heard analogously. There appeals were, therefore, heard analogously and are belong disposed of by this common judgment.

2. In all these second appeals, the defendants who were the tenants under the plaintiff-respondent are appellants. The plaintiff-respondent filed three different suits for eviction in respect of three different premises. The defendants were tenants under the plaintiff in respect if two house premises and a piece of vacant land. It is admitted that so far as the vacant land is concerned, the same shall not be governed by the provisions of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, but so for as other tenanted premises are concerned, the same would be governed thereby.

3. Before proceeding to consider the points involved in such of there appeals, the facts of each case, in brief, may be noted.

3(A). Second Appeal No. 96 of 1981® : This appeal arises cut of a judgment and decree dated the 30th June, 1981passed by Shri Ram Kishore Singh, 6th Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in Title Appeal No. 88/41 of 1976