Having heard Mr. Arun Kumar Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. P.K. Shahi, learned Government Pleader No. 7 on behalf of the State and Mr. Banwari Sharma appearing on behalf of respondent no. 4, in detail, we intend to dispose of this application at the admission stage itself.

2. In short, the grievance of the petitioner, in the present writ application is that though he possessed the requisite qualification as well as teaching experience, he was deprived of the promotions as Assistant Professor and then as Associate Professor and the last one as Professor in the E.N.T. Department of the Medical College whereas his juniors have been allowed to supersede him so much so that on 1.2.1991 the service of respondent no. 4, who is less qualified and possesses less total teaching experience, has been regularised as Associate Professor by the Government notification dated 1.2.1991, as contained in Annexure 1, without disposing of the representations of the petitioner made from time to time.

3. However, in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2, a copy of order dated 1.2.1991 rejecting the representations filed by the petitioner has been annexed as E withou