SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Pat) 133

High Court of Patna
Uday Sinha and B.N. Agrawal, JJ.
M/s Veena Theatre Private limited and another – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar and another – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case Nos. 1895 and 5803 of 1986
Decided On : 28.4.1987

Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 1895/86: M/s Shreenath Singh, G.C. Bharuka and Navniti Pd. Singh.
For the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 5803/86: M/s Madhav Roy and Chandramauli Prasad.
For the respondents in both: M/s J.N.P. Sinha G.A., Alakh Niranjan, J.C. to G.A.; M/s S.K. Singh, G.P. IV arid Vijayashwar Narain Sinha, J.C. to G.P. IV.

The exhibition of slides, shorts, films, trailers, etc. in cinema halls is liable to be taxed as advertisement under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, as amended in 1985.

Headnote:

ADVERTISEMENT TAX - Levy on Cinema Advertisements - Slides, Shorts, Trailers, Films - Whether exigible to tax - Bihar Finance Act, 1981 (Bihar Act 5 of 1981), Ss. 62(a), 63, 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 77 - Bihar Finance (Amendment) Act, 1985 (Bihar Act 4 of 1985).

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, cinema exhibitors, challenged the levy of advertisement tax by the State of Bihar on advertisements exhibited in their cinema halls, including slides, shorts, trailers, and films. They contended that such advertisements were not exigible to tax under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, as amended in 1985.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the exhibition of slides, shorts, films, trailers, etc. in cinema halls was liable to be taxed as advertisement under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, as amended in 1985. The Court interpreted the relevant provisions of the Act and concluded that the Legislature intended to impose tax on such advertisements.

Issues: 1. Whether the exhibition of slides, shorts, films, trailers, etc. in cinema halls was liable to be taxed as advertisement under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, as amended in 1985? 2. Whether the petitioners were liable to obtain permission from the prescribed authority before exhibiting such advertisements?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court interpreted the definition of "advertisement" under Section 62(a) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, and held that the exhibition of slides, shorts, films, trailers, etc. in cinema halls was an "advertisement" within the meaning of the Act. The Court reasoned that such advertisements were exhibited with a view to attract public attention and were for the furtherance of trade, commerce, or services offered. 2. The Court held that the petitioners were not liable to obtain permission from the prescribed authority before exhibiting such advertisements because the manner of obtaining permission had not been prescribed by rules as required under Section 66 of the Act.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition in C.W.J.C. No. 1895 of 1986 and dismissed the petition in C.W.J.C. No. 5803 of 1986.

JUDGMENT

Uday Sinha, J. – These two applications have been heard together and will be disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of clarity I shall refer to the facts of C.W.J.C. No. 1895 of 1986. The decision on questions of law in this case will determine the result of C.W.J.C. No. 5803 of 1986.

2. The two applications are directed against levy of advertisement tax by State of Bihar. The petitioners are Cinema Exhibitors duly licensed under the Bihar Cinema Regulations Act. The second petitioners in both the applications are the Managing Directors of the licensees. In 1981 the State enacted Bihar Finance Act embracing the law on the subject of levy of sales tax, entertainment, advertisement tax etc. etc. Part I thereof related to law of sales (sic) in Bihar. Part II thereof dealt with the advertisement tax traversing sections 62 to 81. Part II of the aforesaid Finance Act, 1981 described what was included within the expression ‘advertisement’. The charging section was enshrined in section 63 originally read as follows:

“63. Charge of Tax.–Subject to the provisions contained in section 64, every person, who makes an advertisement, whether for payment or any other valuable consideration otherwise, shall, pay on every advertisement a tax calculated at such rates and in such manner as laid down in the schedule to this part :

Provided that no such tax shall be levied on any advertisement which is not a sky-sign and which–

(a) is exhibited within the window of any building; or

(b) relates to the trade or business carried on within the land or building upon or over which such advertisement is exhibited or to any sale or letting of such land or building or any effects therein or to any sale to be held upon or in the same; or

(c) relates to the name of the land or building upon or over which the advertisement is exhibited, or to the name of owner or occupier of such land or building.

Explanation.–The expression ‘sky-sign’ in this section means any advertisement, supported on or attached to any post, pole, standard framework or other support wholly or in part upon any land, building, wall or structure including any moveable board on which, or any part of which is visible against the sky from some point of any public place and includes all and every pan of any such post, pole, standard framework or other similar devise employed wholly or in part for the purposes of any advertisement upon or over any land, building or structure upon or over any public place, which is open to the use of public whether actually used or enjoyed or not as such by the public but shall not include –

(a) any flagstaff, pole, vane or weathercock unless adopted, or used wholly or in part for the purpose of any advertisement, or

(b) any advertisement relating to the name of the land or building upon or over which the advertisement is exhibited or to the name of the owner or occupier of such land or building; or

(c) any notice of land or building to be sold, or let, placed upon such land or building.”

The petitioners had no cause for grievance by the enactment of law in section 63. In 1985 Part II of Bihar Finance Act was amended. The significant amendment was introduced in the proviso to section 63. The proviso contained three clauses as quoted earlier. The real change which has irked the petitioners was in proviso (a). After the amendment clause (a) of the proviso reads as follows :

“Provided that no such tax shall be levied on any advertisement which is not a sky-sign and which–

(a) is exhibited within the show-window or show-case of a shop or building excluding an advertisement exhibited at any place of entertainment by means of a cinematography through slides, trailer of film or films ; or”

The amended complexion of clause (a) came into effect from 1.8.1985. In terms of the amendment trailers and shorts and films which had the character of advertising goods or services became exigible to tax. By Annexure 1 dated 18.10.1985 the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 1895 of 1






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top