Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Sate as well as opposite party no.2.

2. In this case, petitioners are challenging the order dated 18th August 2012 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chapra in Trial No. 3637 of 2012, arising out from Complaint Case No. 3548 of 2011 for offences under sections 467, 469, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. From the record it appears, Raj Kumar Singh (complainant) filed a complaint case vide Complaint Case No. 3548 of 2011 where the allegation has been made, mother of Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Singh executed the sale deed of Khata No. 35 (as per counter affidavit Khata No.135), Khesra No. 125, Mauja Sonepur, area 1 Katha and 6.2 Dhurki on 11.02.2003 in favour of the complainant and the complainant having in peaceful possession over the land. The complainant filed a petition for mutation of his name with respect to the said land and accordingly the land was mutated in his name.

4. In the complaint petition it has been mentioned, there was a family partition and the said land had fallen in the share of Kumar Ranbir Singh, father of Rajesh Kumar Singh. It has been alleged, Rajesh Kumar Singh ha