SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Pat) 62

AMARESH KUMAR LAL
Sumintra Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Anant Kumar-1.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Singh.

ORDER


This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.07.2012 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Patna Bench in Claim Application No. OA 000142/2002 by which the claim application, filed by the appellant under Section 125 of the Railways Act, 1989 read with Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 claiming a compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- for the death of her son due to injuries sustained by him in an untoward incident, has been dismissed.

2. The case of the appellant as per claim application, in brief, is that on 10.12.2001, her son Uday Sao (deceased) boarded in Rajgir-Danapur Shuttle train at Patna Sahib Railway Station with a valid ticket. During journey, he accidentally fell down from the train and received grievous injuries. He was rushed to N.M.C.H, Patna where he died in course of treatment.

3. The respondent filed written statement that the claim application is not maintainable in law. The alleged accident was not an untoward incident in terms of provisions of Section 123 of the Railways (Amendment) Act, 1994. It has not been admitted that the deceased fell down from the passenger train near Patna Sahib Railway Station on 10.12.2001. The claimant has to pro























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top