ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI, J.:–Appellant is the informant and father of the deceased. He has preferred this appeal under the provisions of proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order dated 31st of July, 2012 passed by the Adhoc Additional Judge, 1st, Buxar in Sessions Trail No.1/09, whereby and whereunder the learned court below has acquitted the respondent nos.2 to 4 from the charges framed against them under Sections 302, 302/34 and 307/34 and Section 27(1) of the Arms Act.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that in the morning of 19.08.2008 at 6.30 p.m. the appellant received information that his four bighas of land on khata no.1, which he had purchased from one Premchand Keshri, was going to be ploughed by the four accused persons by means of a tractor, with the help of 3-4 other unknown persons. On this information, he along with his sons, namely, the deceased Sarabjeet Kumar Gupta, PW-4 Ajit Kumar Gupta, PW-2 Munna Kumar Gupta, proceeded to his land. When they reached Manikpur canal bridge they saw Ramayan Pandey carrying a licensed gun and Ranjan Pandey and Raju Pandey (respondent no.3) armed with country made pistols. On seei