SHIVAJI PANDEY
Sushil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Petroleum & Natural Gas Government Of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi – Respondent
Heard counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. In this case, petitioner is challenging the order dated 17th July 2012 passed by the Deputy General Manager, Respondent no.3 enclosing the speaking order in which it has been held that the petitioner while submitting application for LPG Distributorship suppressed the fact about his father, placing basic reliance on the written statement filed by the petitioner in Title Suit No. 63 of 2000.
Union of India and others Vs. Hari Om
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Municipal Committee, Hosiarpur v. Punjab SEB
Arulvelu v. State reported in (2009)10 SCC 206
Air India Ltd. v. Cochin International Airport Ltd. AIR 2000 SC 801
R. D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority
Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar Union v. Union of India
Asstt. Collector, Central Excise v. Dunlop India Ltd.
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.