SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Pat) 286

NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH, I.A.ANSARI, V.N.SINHA
Narendra Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Suresh Prasad Singh No.1, Vitesh Kumar Singh, Sarvan Kumar (in 8152); M/s Satya Ranjan Sinha, Sri Nath Pathak, Sandeep Kumar (in 9574); Mr. Ratan Kumar (in 11781); Mr. Anil Kumar (in 16050); Mr. S.P. Srivastava (in 20570).
For the State-Respondents: M/s R.B. Mahto, Lalit Kishore, D.K. Sinha, Roy Shivaji Nath, Shambhu Nath, Ranjit Kumar Pandey (in all); Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath (in 11781); Mr. Ajay (in 16050).
For the Patna Municipal Corporation : M/s Y.V. Giri, H.S. Himkar (in all); M/s Prasoon Sinha, Manish Kumar No.2 (in 9574).
For the Intervenors : M/s Pankaj Kumar Jha, Santosh Kumar, Madhurendra Sharma (in IAs 9508 in 8152); Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam (in IA 324, 9317 in 8152); Mr. Vinod Kanth (in IA 59 in 8152); Mr. Prasoon Sinha (in person (in IA 108 in 8152); Mr. Praveen Kumar (in IA 9508 in 9574); Dr. Kumar Amitesh Chandra (in IA 9508 in 9574).

CAV Judgment

(Per: Hon'ble Mr. Justice I.A. Ansari)

Compelled to do what is imperative so as to adhere to, and maintain, judicial discipline and impelled by the call of duty, I, with some degree of sadness and a deep sense of anguish, pen down my views and conclusions in the context of the facts and attending circumstances, which have led to the constitution of this Full Bench. Strictly speaking, administration of justice inheres judicial discipline. No wonder, therefore, that while administering justice, judicial discipline is needed to be adhered to.

2. These two Public Interest Litigations (PIL) and the Interlocutory Applications filed therein have been ordered to be listed before this Full Bench so as to arrest apparently conflicting directions emanating from two Division Benches of this Court in relation to a singular matter, which has arisen from the State Government's Resolution No. 17184, dated 12.12.2014, placing, in exercise of its powers under Rule 3(1)(a) of All India Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1969, under suspension, Shri Kuldip Narayan, I.A.S., who had been functioning at the time of his suspension, as Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, and the consequ



















































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top