SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Pat) 740

ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
Madan Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar Singh.
For the Opp. Party : Dr. Mayanand Jha.

ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, J.:–By filing the instant application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short „Cr.P.C.?), the petitioners have challenged the order dated 01.10.2012 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ara in Tr. No.3577 of 2012 arising out of Ara (M) P.S.Case No. 49 of 2010, by which the petition dated 13.03.2012 filed under section 239 of the Cr.P.C. for discharge has been rejected.

2. Ara Muffasil P.S.Case No. 49 of 2010 was registered on the basis of self written report of Lal Bihari Paswan, Officer-in-Charge, Ara Muffasil Police Station against the petitioners under sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act. According to the allegations made in the First Information Report, on the basis of statement of petitioner no.1 Madan Rai, Ara Muffasil P.S.Case No. 39 of 2010 was registered under sections 341, 384, 354, 379 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as 25(1-B) (a), 26 and 27 of the Arms Act against one Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Guddu and others. During the course of investigation, the police found the case to be false. It was found that due to previous enmity the petitioners had actually beaten up Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Guddu seve

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top